Collapse Universality & Pre-Regularity Instrumentation
Reference Paper:
"Collapse Universality in the UNNS Substrate — From Class-Level Uniqueness to Quantitative Stability"
📄 View PDF
This dashboard is built to accompany and instrument the reference paper.
Use the paper as the canonical definitions layer; use the dashboard as the instrumentation and evidence layer.
1. What this dashboard is for
This dashboard is not a general UNNS lab index.
It is a theory-bound instrumentation surface created to support and explain the paper:
"Collapse Universality in the UNNS Substrate"
Its purpose is to help users understand:
- how τ-energy is operationalized,
- how collapse (Operator XII) is realized in practice,
- how descriptor-level stability and universality are empirically probed,
- and how certain structures (e.g. μ★ ≈ φ) qualify as emergent, not tuned.
This dashboard organizes selected chambers by functional role, not by completeness or chronology.
2. Two kinds of chambers: why they are grouped
You will see chambers grouped under two headings:
⚙️ Calibration Chambers
These chambers define measurement infrastructure. They answer:
- What is τ-energy in practice?
- How are admissibility constraints enforced?
- How is τcrit chosen?
They do not demonstrate universality or emergence by themselves.
Example: Chamber XXVIII — τ-Energy Calibration
🔍 Pre-Regularity Probe Chambers
These chambers test theoretical claims using the calibrated infrastructure. They answer:
- Does collapse produce stable seed classes?
- Are descriptor values locally contractive?
- Do dispersive dynamics destroy stability?
- Is an observed attractor robust or tuned?
Examples: Chamber XIV (local attractor), Chamber XV (dispersive coupling)
3. Where is "Chamber XII" (Collapse)?
⚠️ This is a common point of confusion.
There is no standalone file named "Chamber XII".
Instead: Operator XII (Collapse) is implemented as an embedded layer inside the UNNS Empirical Lab
(unns-lab_v0.4.2.html).
In practical terms, this embedded Chamber XII is the logic that:
- evaluates τ-energy or equivalent mismatch,
- compares it to τcrit,
- terminates unstable recursion,
- reseeds admissible structures.
This collapse layer is pre-physical and pre-geometric.
All downstream analyses (constants, spectra, plots) occur after collapse.
4. How to read a chamber card
Each chamber card contains three layers of information:
(a) Role ribbon — indicates why the chamber is here:
- τ-Energy Calibration
- Local Attractor Probe
- Dispersive Coupling Probe
- Collapse Enforcement Probe
(b) Diagnostic annotations — measured or inferred properties:
- Δ″(μ★) > 0 · Local basin confirmed
- LCloc ≈ 0.4 (contractive regime)
- Coupled: XII / XV
(c) Status / Emergence badges — epistemic status:
- ✓ COMPLETE — implementation finished
- ✓ Emergent (robust) — persists under parameter perturbations
- ⚠ Robustness sweep pending — do not treat as emergent yet
Only probe chambers can receive an Emergent badge.
5. The Pre-Regularity Diagnostics panel
This panel (top of page) declares the global experimental context:
- how τ-energy is aggregated (weights),
- how τcrit is calibrated,
- which variables define the descriptor space,
- whether local contractivity is expected,
- whether emergence testing is active.
These settings apply to all chambers below unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Note: Weight sequence parameters (e.g., N for finite horizon) are matched to chamber-specific recursion depths.
The paper permits multiple canonical families (§16.1); chambers declare their choice explicitly.
6. How the chambers work together
The paper's logic is not "one chamber proves everything". Instead:
Chamber XXVIII
↓ defines τ-energy and τcrit
Operator XII (embedded)
↓ collapse selects admissible structures
Chamber XIV
↓ tests local descriptor contraction
Chamber XV
↓ tests dispersive stability
Universality and emergence claims are valid only if stability survives this entire chain.
7. What you may and may not conclude
✓ You may conclude:
- collapse is τ-energy–driven and observer-independent,
- descriptor-level universality exists,
- certain attractors are locally stable and robust,
- regularity emerges before geometry or PDEs.
✗ You may not conclude:
- physical constants are predicted,
- continuum equations are derived,
- smoothness or probability is fundamental.
Those are downstream interpretations, not substrate claims.
8. How to use this dashboard as a reader of the paper
- Read the Pre-Regularity Diagnostics panel first
- Identify which chambers are calibration vs probe
- Follow collapse → stability → dispersion logic
- Treat chamber outputs as empirical probes, not proofs
- Use the dashboard as a live appendix, not a substitute for the paper
9. Paper-Dashboard Relationship
Paper = definitions and claims. Qualitative universality (Theorem 1), quantitative stability (Theorem 2),
operational closure (Section 16), emergence vs tuning criteria (Definition 10).
Dashboard = measurements and probes. Chamber XXVIII instantiates Δ(Sn),
Operator XII enforces collapse, Chamber XIV provides empirical signature for local contraction,
Chamber XV probes dispersive coupling.
The dashboard should be read as a live appendix to the reference paper.
Summary (one sentence):
This dashboard shows how collapse is measured, where stability appears, and which structures survive τ-energy filtering,
providing empirical support for collapse universality and pre-regularity in the UNNS Substrate.
Reference: "Collapse Universality in the UNNS Substrate — From Class-Level Uniqueness to Quantitative Stability"
[PDF]